Upon encountering an alleged violation of the Honor Code, the instructor has the option of proposing to handle the case directly (autonomously) or of referring the case to the Honor Council. Under either option, a report must be filed with the Aggie Honor System Office. Additionally, prior to submitting a Student Response Form to the Aggie Honor System Office, students may also choose to move a case from the autonomous process into the Honor Council process.
If the instructor decides to handle the case autonomously, a meeting may occur with the Alleged Violator. In this meeting, the instructor shall inform the student of the charge(s) and give the student an opportunity to respond in-person. If the allegations are delivered to the student in writing in advance of the meeting, the space is to be designated a Concealed Carry Weapons Restricted Space. The Aggie Honor System Office’s process for requesting this designation is located at http://ccrr.tamu.edu.
Alternatively, the student may be notified of the allegation through TAMU email. Prior to making a final decision as to whether academic misconduct occurred, the professor should wait five (5) University business days for a response from the accused student. If the student responds within the five University business days, the instructor will consider that information in determining if a violation occurred and what an appropriate sanction is for that behavior. If the student expresses a desire to meet in-person to discuss the allegations instead of responding through email, the professor may accommodate this request and the meeting space will be designated as a Concealed Carry Weapons Restricted Space and a request for such a space must be submitted through http://ccrr.tamu.edu.
If the student does not reciprocate contact or respond with additional information after five (5) University business days, the instructor may file the Honor Code Violation Report online autonomously with the notation “student was not available for a response” in the student response section. Reporters should be prepared to detail all attempts to contact the student and secure a response from them. If the student does not respond or reciprocate contact, skip to Step 5 of this process.
During the meeting with the Alleged Violator, or after considering the response from the student through email, the instructor will determine if academic misconduct occurred. If no violation is found, the process concludes and no action is taken. If the instructor determines that there has been a violation of the Honor Code, as demonstrated by a preponderance of the information, the instructor may either file the report autonomously following the steps below or file the report and refer the case to the Honor Council for adjudication. At any point and for any reason, an instructor may forward a case to the Honor Council for adjudication.
If the instructor determines that there has been a violation of the Honor Code and wishes to handle the case autonomously, the instructor determines the severity of the Honor Code violation and assesses a sanction using the sanction options provided by the Aggie Honor System Office.
The instructor may impose the following sanctions, which are fully described in the Honor System Rules:
- Academic Sanctions
- Educational Sanctions
If, after meeting with the student and/or communicating with the student about the allegations through email, the instructor is still unsure of whether a violation has been committed, or is not comfortable with the sanctioning process, the case can be filed online through the Honor Code Violation Report process and forwarded to the Honor Council for adjudication.
If, in the opinion of the instructor, the violation is so egregious that it deserves consideration of separation from the University, the case may be referred to the Honor Council for adjudication.
Once a faculty member determines that it is more likely than not that a violation occurred, based on the preponderance of the information standard, and the sanction is determined, a report will be filed with the Aggie Honor System Office.
Students will be contacted by the Aggie Honor System Office through their University email. Students will be informed of their rights and responsibilities as an accused by AHSO staff. The student will respond to the charges, indicate their understanding of their rights in the process, and confirm their response to the instructor's allegations. The student’s options are to:
- agree with the charges and the applied sanction,
- indicate their agreement that a violation occurred but intention to appeal the sanction only through the Honor Council Appeals Process, or
- move the allegation into the Honor Council Proceeding.
Students will also be informed of possible outcomes of each of these three options.
Once an instructor identifies potential academic misconduct, they have 10 business days to file a report with the Aggie Honor System Office. The Director of the Aggie Honor System Office has the option of extending this deadline as determined to be appropriate.
126.96.36.199 ADJUDICATION PROCESSES - HONOR COUNCIL PROCEEDINGS
The Aggie Honor System Office facilitates two processes that address allegations of academic misconduct through the Honor Council. These two proceedings are Honor Council Conferences and Honor Council Hearing Panels. The Director of the Aggie Honor System Office or their designee shall determine which process the AHSO shall utilize in addressing an allegation within the juristdiction of the Honor Council.
The Honor Council Hearing Panel Process shall be utilized only when it is determined that the accused student has a previous finding of responsibility for academic misconduct on file with the AHSO or the Director or their designee determines the alleged behavior is particularly egregious and warrants consideration of suspension or expulsion from the university.
Honor Council Conference
A student or instructor may call the Honor System staff for clarification of an alleged violation of the Honor Code. If the student or instructor (hereinafter referred to as the “Reporting Party”) decides an alleged violation may have occurred, the Honor Code Violation Report form found on the Honor System website is completed. This report becomes a part of the Case File. The Reporting Party shall file the Honor Code Violation Report online with the AHSO no later than 10 university business days or as soon as practicable.
AHSO staff confirms the accused student does not have a previous finding of responsiblity for academic misconduct on file. If the accused student has a previous finding of responsibility for academic misconduct, the case must move through the Honor Council Hearing Panel process.
The AHSO appoints an Academic Integrity Administrator (AIA) to facilitate the case. Accused students are directed to arrange a first-contact meeting with this staff member or otherwise familiarize themselves with the Honor Council Conference process. The accused student is advised of the charges they could be facing, their rights as an accused student, and the process moving forward. Students are also notified that they may be assisted by an advisor, consistent with 188.8.131.52 during the Honor Council Conference.
The AIA gathers information from involved parties and creates the case file. Any information an accused student or faculty reporter wishes to be included in the case file for consideration during the Honor Council Conference shall be provided to the AHSO at least 24 hours prior to the scheduled start time of the Honor Council Conference.
The AHSO schedules an Honor Council Conference. Scheduled parties shall include a chair and three Honor Council members. The chair shall be a faculty, student, or non-AHSO staff member responsible for facilitating the Honor Council Conference and shall not vote in any part of the proceedings. Voting Honor Council members shall be selected from the available pool for the scheduled conference. The reporting party, witnesses with first-hand knowledge of the incident, and the accused student may also be invited to the Honor Council Conference. When the chair determines each participant has had an opportunity to present their information and respond to questions, the conference will move into deliberations. The Honor Council members will deliberate in private and determine, by a preponderance of the information, whether or not the accused student is responsible for a violation of the Aggie Code of Honor.
If the voting Honor Council members determine that a violation did NOT occur, the case is dismissed and no sanctions are applied. If the student is found to be responsible for a violation, the voting members of the Honor Council Conference may receive additional information that impacts the student's sanction. Voting members will deliberate in private and decide upon an appropriate sanction.
The Honor Council Conference process may not assign sanctions listed in 184.108.40.206 Separation from the University. All other sanctions may be assigned through the Honor Council Conference process.
The Director or their designee notifies the accused student of the Honor Council Conference outcome and the accused student's right to appeal as outlined below.
Honor Council Hearing Panel
A student or instructor may call the Honor System staff for clarification of an alleged violation of the Honor Code. If the student or instructor (hereinafter referred to as the “Reporting Party”) decides an alleged violation may have occurred, the Honor Code Violation Report form found on the Honor System website
is completed. This report becomes a part of the Case File.
The Reporting Party shall file the Honor Code Violation Report online with the AHSO no later than 10 University Business Days of the Reporting Party’s discovery of the alleged violation. Alternatively, the Reporting Party may provide details about the allegation to AHSO staff and an AHSO staff member may file the Violatoin Report directly. The Director of the ASHO may extend this deadline as determined to be appropriate. The Academic Integrity Administrator issues a case number and the report is filed in the AHSO, and the report data is entered in the Aggie Honor System Office database. The instructor may choose to engage the Autonomous Process, if it is determined by the AHSO that there are no previous violations for the student, or the instructor may choose to refer it to the Honor Council. Faculty Members must report all violations, whether handled autonomously or referred to the Honor Council.
- If the instructor handles the case Autonomously, please see “Adjudication Process - Instructor."
- If Reporting Party refers the Case to the Honor Council, the AHSO starts a Case File and sends an email to the Alleged Violator notifying the individual of the report.
- A first-contact meeting is arranged with the student. At the meeting the student is advised of the charges they could be facing, their rights as an accused student, and the process moving forward.
The AHSO appoints one student and one faculty Case Investigator from the members of the Honor Council and schedules a meeting with the Case investigators, the Reporting Party, any witnesses, and the accused student.
The Case Investigators meet with the Reporting Party and the accused student to gather information that supports the allegation, including the course syllabus, assignment guidelines, and any other materials that help clarify the Case. The Reporting Party and accused student may offer the names of others who have knowledge that could clarify the Case. It is critical that all communications remain confidential (until shared with the accused violator later in the process). The Case Investigators may also meet with witnesses identified by the Reporting Party and accused student during this step.
The Case investigators determine whether there is sufficient information to support a violation of the Honor Code.
- If there is not sufficient information to support a violation, the case investigators so inform the Director. The AHSO will then create an Event File to keep a record of the investigation on file. The Event File will not contain references to the Alleged Violator’s name. No further action occurs and the pending charges against the student are dismissed.
- If the Case investigators determine there is sufficient evidence to hear the Case, they recommend that the Case continue to a Hearing Panel and confirm which charges the alleged violator will face during the Honor Council Hearing Panel. Both the Reporting Party and the Alleged Violator have the opportunity to review the Case File before the hearing.
The Case investigators write a report summarizing all interviews conducted. The official report will contain all information and documents collected. They send this report to the Academic Integrity Administrator. The report becomes a part of the Case File.
The AHSO identifies four members of the Honor Council to serve as a Hearing Panel. The Hearing Panel is comprised of two student members and two faculty members. Three of these members are voting members. The fourth member is selected as a non-voting Chair. The Chair position may alternate between student and faculty Honor Council members as determined by the Director.
A hearing date and time are set by the AHSO. The Chair and Hearing Panel members receive an advance copy of the Case Materials just prior to the Case Hearing to conduct a rudimentary preparation only. The AHSO will perform due diligence to ensure that no conflicts of interest exist during the selection of the Hearing Panel. However, at this point the Hearing Panel members inform the Director if there are any conflicts of interest. The Case Materials will not be shared or discussed among the Hearing Panel members prior to the beginning of the panel. The Case Hearing will be held at a specified time at a location disclosed only to the parties involved in the hearing.
The AHSO furnishes an agenda for the hearing procedure to the Chair of the Honor Council Hearing Panel, which is based on the official reports. Hearing Panel members receive information from all participants and the case file. They then break to deliberate in private.
During deliberations, Hearing Panel members first identify whether the student is or is not responsible for a violation of the Aggie Code of Honor. If the student is found to be responsible for a violation, the Hearing Panel receives any additional information that may impact the student's sanction, deliberates, and decides upon appropriate sanctions.
The Director notifies the Alleged Violator in writing of the Hearing Panel decision. If the Alleged Violator is found in violation and sanctioned an F*, or if the Alleged Violator is sanctioned to attend the Remediation Program, he or she shall contact the Director for further instructions.
220.127.116.11 APPEALS PROCESS
The following process shall apply to every appeal, whether an appeal to the Honor Council for a sanction not involving separation from the university, or an appeal of a decision of separation.
A student found responsible for a violation has five (5) university business days to file an appeal online to the Director of the Aggie Honor System Office. The format for the appeal may be found at http://aggiehonor.tamu.edu/.
An evaluation of the written appeal by the Director will determine whether an appeal hearing is warranted. The Director’s decision regarding the merit of an appeal is final. Students will be given opportunity to have one appeal and can get assistance from the Honor System Office when completing the appeal form.
The Director has the option of extending any deadline for extenuating circumstances.
The following are the only accepted basis for appeal.
- Substantial new evidence not available at the time of the original hearing: To consider new information, sufficient to alter a decision or other relevant facts not brought out in the original hearing, because such information and/or facts were not known to the person appealing at the time of the original hearing.
- A violation of due process rights: To determine whether the original hearing was conducted fairly in light of the charges and evidence presented, and in conformity with prescribed procedures giving the accused student a reasonable opportunity to prepare and present rebuttal of allegations.
- The sanction is not commensurate with the violation: To determine whether the sanction(s) imposed were appropriate for the violation of the Honor System Rules which the student was found to have committed.
- The finding of responsibility is inconsistent with the facts presented in the hearing: To determine whether the decision reached regarding the accused student was based on a preponderance of the evidence, that is, whether the facts in the case were sufficient to establish that a violation of the Honor System Rules occurred.
Upon receipt of the written request for a hearing and approval from the Director for an appeal hearing to proceed, the Case Manager shall set a time and place for the hearing as soon as practicable.
The Chair shall sit as a hearing officer and shall not take part in the vote.
The proceedings of the appeal process shall be informal in nature and need not comply with the formal processes associated with the criminal and civil courts.
The student shall have the right to have one person serve as a personal advisor/counselor to consult during the student proceedings. (Students who are charged in the same fact pattern, or who are not in good standing with the university are not eligible to serve as an advisor/counselor at proceedings). A personal advisor or counselor (who may be an attorney) may appear at the proceedings with the accused student to provide advice, but may not represent the accused student or directly question or cross-examine witnesses, except in a case where the university is represented by an attorney. There is no restriction on who a student may consult or seek advice from, this restriction only pertains to the Honor Council and Appeals proceedings.
An Honor System representative and the appealing student shall be afforded the opportunity for a reasonable oral presentation and shall be permitted to file typewritten or reproduced material.
The Chair shall cause all portions of the hearing to be recorded, except for the panel’s deliberations.
The panel may take any of the following actions in response to an appeal: it may review the case and uphold the findings and/or sanctions from the previous level; it may review the case and reverse a finding of responsibility for any or all charges; it may review the case and reduce the sanction(s); it may review the case and require that it be heard again by the original hearing body.
After hearing an appeal, the panel will go into closed session to deliberate. Upon conclusion of its deliberation, the panel shall inform the student of its decision. A letter outlining the decision of the panel shall be sent to the appealing student through email.